Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Education. Show all posts

Saturday, April 21, 2012

The Role of Education in Resolving the Issue on Language and Culture in Philippine Education


Philippines is said to have diverse culture.  Language and culture are sometimes barriers to educational development.  What then should be the role of education in resolving the issue on language and culture in Philippine Education?

The role of education in resolving the issue on language and culture in Philippine Education is to serve as a guiding light in giving the relevance or significant value of language and culture.  As Samovar, Porter, & Jain (1981) emphasize that culture and communication are inseparable because culture not only dictates who talks to whom, about what, and how the communication proceeds, it also helps to determine how people encode messages, the meanings they have for messages, and the conditions and circumstances under which various messages may or may not be sent, noticed, or interpreted... Culture...is the foundation of communication.

The role of education serves as an instrument of change. Educated persons should understand their positions as members of both a local community and the world community and they must believe that their lives can make a difference especially when they give due  importance to their diverse culture.

Education is also fundamental not only to the transmission of culture but to preparing the ground for its continuous renewal. Learning is more than the assimilation of knowledge. It is knowing how to create new knowledge ... and the true purposes of doing so. Skinner was right when he said that "Education is what survives when what has been learnt has been forgotten". It is in this sense that education represents empowerment. By promoting creativity and humane values, education becomes the ally of cultural responsiveness, which is itself the key to positive relations between cultures. UNESCO is committed to preserving and protecting what its Constitution calls "the fruitful diversity of cultures". One reason for doing so is that cultural and linguistic diversity represents a vital resource, a source of human enrichment. Each culture or language system constitutes a unique mode of interpreting or relating to a world so complex that the only hope of knowing it or dealing with it is to approach it from as many perspectives as possible. At the same time, culture is essential to human identity and therefore to human dignity. At the heart of so many of our educational and social problems is the loss of cultural identity that gives special value and meaning to life. As Carlos Fuentes so aptly put it : "culture is a sea-shell in which we hear voices of what we are, what we were, what we forgot and what we can be". Without the sea-shell, young people have great difficulty in finding themselves and finding their way. If we wish to build positive intercommunity relations, we must start by protecting and promoting cultural identity.

The concept "culture" as cited in R. A. 7356, which has been translated in Filipino by the Committee on Language and Translation, has five characteristics that constitute its principles: 

(1) Culture is a right; 
(2) Culture expresses the national identity; 
(3) Culture is independent, dynamic, progressive and pro-people; 
(4) Culture is of the people and therefore the national cultural policies and programs to be formulated are pluralistic, democratic, free and liberative; and 
(5) That culture is for the people. 

Section 7 of R. A. 7356 makes the Filipino citizen, responsible for the preservation of the national historical and cultural heritage and its indigenous traditions.

The concept "culture" then as characterized in R. A. 7356, using the Bierstedt model (The Social Order, R. Bierstedt, 1970) has three main elements: 

(1) The ideas, beliefs, attitudes of the people as national community, which include their scientific knowledge and beliefs; their religious beliefs; their myth, legends, folk literature, superstitions, riddles, proverbs and sayings, literature, philosophy and such others;   
(2) Their norms or ways of doing, which include those as described by the Constitution; laws, rules and regulations, credo, customs, habits, rituals, ceremonies, and modes; 
(3) The material, or natural resources they have, which include natural resources, flora and fauna, material wealth, infrastractures, technology, artifacts, works of art, and the like. 

Philippine Culture is a humanizing culture, a culture of generally being for others such as indicated in terms like "Kapwa Tao" (fellow human being), "Tao po;" (introducing one's self at anothers house), "Tao ko" (my human being, husband, as the wife calls him), or  in the saying, "Madaling maging tao, mahirap magpakatao:"It is easy to become a person, it is difficult to become a human being."
The various ethnolinguistic communities, numbering more than 76, through their folklores, riddles, proverbs, sayings, legends and myths, are enriching and enriched as the national language propagates them.

The three main elements of culture--ideas, norm and resources--are also to be found in the 11 basic needs--food, water, shelter, clothing, livelihood, education, health, power, mobility, recreation and leisure, and ecological balance. These basic needs are articulated, acquired, sustained by processes of communication through languages.

Republic Act 7356 calls for helping develop Philippine culture and the Arts in an atmosphere of unbridled creativity and artistic freedom. Language and culture - inseparable - are considered processes for national development.

The relation of Language and Culture assumes cogency as Filipinos continue to celebrate the Centennial of Philippine Independence and try to better their lives, their economic, political and social culture. This cogency is underscored by present moves to improve the education delivery system. As a national community, we are enriched by the overlays of western and other cultures in the fabric of our historical heritage, but because we indigenize these overlays, it might take some time before the basic characteristics of Filipino culture concept are studied.

Language - the national language, Filipino, in particular - when culturally enriched by regional and sub-regional languages of various Filipino ethnolinguistic communities through its intellectualization, preserves national identity, even redeeming this from its inchoate political, economic and social environments. This national identity is strengthened by the national language as it continues to be developed and enriched by usage even as the Philippines aspires to have an active part in the process of globalization of the economies of the world. 

In the study and use or application of regional languages, including minor and major languages, culture is promoted and developed.

Because both written and oral language(s) and culture do not develop in a vacuum. By a continuing process of acculturation through, among others, language planning, usage and through translations, the national community of artists are also strengthened as they learn from others through English and other languages.

The potential enrichment of language, in this case, Filipino, begins, therefore, from an understanding of the concept culture in its various elements and manifestations. This is especially true in the context of Philippine historical and cultural heritage. Many more substantiation, confirmation and affirmation can be done by research, academic and otherwise - through the media of dissemination and communication and by social interaction

Developing Filipino language and culture, when planned and implemented as a national program for inculcating a sense of national purpose and unity, can be a challenging project for strengthening the national identity. It can also make the advocacy for an understanding of the relationship of language to culture and vice-versa, a most relevant program – not  barriers to educational development.

Monday, March 5, 2012

The Importance of Philosophy to a Person


It can be said that while we study Philosophy as a body of knowledge, is aimed to make a person/man a full man-cultured, refined and well-rounded.  It provides him the ability to synthesize, criticize, systematize, assimilate, and evaluate a variety and huge mass of knowledge.  So it is an important aspect of his total development that will provide opportunities to lead a life worthy of man’s dignity as an individual and as a member of society.

The study of philosophies of various thinkers by any person can be exposed to different philosophical thoughts and can develop his own personal philosophy, which in return would give him the necessary direction of life.  These philosophies on hand would give him a strong foundation in meeting the demands of his profession and in coping with the problems brought about by his diverse activities.  These learned philosophies will also guide him in choosing the right option/direction from a wider perspective for philosophy offers the person a holistic view that will undoubtedly be an integral part of his human development. It is therefore concluded that the importance of philosophy to any person is: it serves as a bulwark against mental servitude and thus provides a framework within which he can think and act intelligently.

It can be added that philosophy can be used to help convince people that you are right, and (sometimes, when it’s done correctly, and depending on your opponent’s view) that they are wrong.  For example, if you want a raise from your boss, if you know what these good reasons are, such as increasing the sales of the company, the quality of the product, the efficiency of the company, etc., and how to show the way in which these elements are vital to the company’s well-being, you would stand a better chance of getting a raise than if you were to argue with your boss using bad reasons, such as:  “My poor family cannot live on my salary alone, and I really need to have more money” or “If you don’t give me a raise, I’m going to quit and take my friends with me.”  The reason for the first appeal (about your poor family) is a bad one, for it is an appeal to pity on emotion, and if you haven’t benefited the company lately, then it doesn’t really matter if your family is going hungry – it is not the company’s responsibility to feed your family (it’s yours).  The second appeal (“I’m quitting”) is an appeal to force.  The company should not give you a raise out of fear because you’re threatening them; the company should give you a raise because of your work merits..  In short, if you have a job (and this is about 98% of us) or even if you do not, philosophy can help you argue well for your position.  And in order to be able to argue well for your position, you need to think.

As just one of its many specializations, philosophy contains the study of ethics, which is the study of happiness and how best to attain it (or indeed if and how that is possible).  The main questions of ethics are “What is happiness?” and “How should I live?”  There are, as you might guess, many and varied answers to these questions.  I would guess that every single person is, and should be, interested in whether we can be happy, what happiness is, and how we can act so as to obtain happiness (assuming it exists).  Everyone should be interested to know what the philosophers of the West and East have said about happiness and how best to attain them.  The answers range from “true happiness is not attainable in this lifetime” to “happiness is a state of mind” or “happiness is an activity” and so on.  You may not think that any or all of these views of happiness are correct, but you might be able to put another theory together using your favorite parts of some of the extant ones.  It is worth finding out if someone has already articulated the right theory, or whether you can improve on an existing theory, since nothing less than your current and future happiness may be riding on your view of happiness.

I will close with two quotations, the first of which comes from the American Philosophical Association’s 1992 publication entitled, “The Philosophy Major:”

The study of philosophy serves to develop intellectual abilities important for life as a whole, beyond the knowledge and skills required for any particular profession.  Properly pursued, it enhances analytical, critical, and interpretive capacities that are applicable to any subject-matter, and in any human context.  It cultivates the capacities and appetite for self-expression and reflection, for exchange and debate of ideas, for life-long learning, and for dealing with problems for which there are no easy answers.  It also helps to prepare one for the tasks of citizenship.  Participation in political and community affairs today is all too often insufficiently informed, manipulable and vulnerable to demagoguery.  A good philosophical education enhances the capacity to participate responsibly and intelligently in public life.

Second, Dr. George James, from the University of North Texas, warns that philosophy is not for everyone:

It’s not for persons who have no interest in asking deeper questions.  At the end of a lifetime of philosophizing one great philosopher made the claim that the unexamined life is not worth living.  Many people don’t believe that.  Some people don’t even care to raise the question.  Philosophy very simply is not for them.  Philosophy is not for followers.  If all you want is to get a job and a paycheck, if all you want is to spend as little time and effort at that job as you can and still get paid for it, then philosophy is not for you.  Philosophy is not training.  It’s education!  It’s for persons who want to understand, who want not just to live, but to live well.  It is for persons who simply could never be happy without asking why. (Adapted from Dr. George James’ text)

Good Teaching


Students and faculty "know" good teaching when they experience it, but often find it difficult to articulate the specifics of what they experience as good teaching. The many approaches to understanding teaching have been addressed in broad reviews of the research literature on post secondary teaching.
One such review synthesized thirty-one (31) studies in which students and faculty members specified characteristics important to good teaching (Feldman, 1988). The analysis revealed extensive similarities across studies and between the two groups. In these studies, students and faculty members at the same institutions (universities, four-year colleges, and 2-year colleges) were asked to describe attitudes or practices important to good teaching; some students asked respondents to characterize "best" or "ideal" teachers. Both students and faculty members gave high rankings to the following seven categories (although students placed somewhat more emphasis than faculty on instructor's stimulation of interest and their elocutionary skills). The following phrases from survey questions used by researchers serve to define the seven categories.
Faculty and Students Agree - Good Teaching Involves:
Sensitivity to, and Concern with, Class Level and Progress:
·         instructor communicates effectively at a level appropriate to students'
understanding
·         textbook is of appropriate difficulty for the student
·         instructor seems to be concerned with whether students learn the material
·         instructor determines if one student's problem is common to others
·         instructor realizes when students are bored or confused
Preparation; Organization of the Course:
·         instructor is well prepared for class
·         instructor organizes the course in a logical manner
·         the course organization assists students in developing basic concepts
·         new information is presented logically, and is related to ideas already introduced
·         students perceive the instructor as well-organized
·         lectures are easy to outline
Knowledge of the Subject:
·         instructor demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of his/her subject
·         instructor knows the current research and literature in his/her field
·         instructor knows his/her field of specialization very well
Enthusiasm (for Subject or for Teaching):
·         instructor seems interested in teaching the course
·         instructor's ability to convey interest and enthusiasm for subject matter
·         instructor is dynamic and energetic
Clarity and Understandableness:
·         instructor explains clearly and attempts to answer all questions
·         students are able to follow and understand class lectures/presentations
·         instructor relates concepts in a systematic manner that helps understanding
·         instructor uses well chosen examples to clarify points
·         instructor summarizes major points
·         instructor interprets abstract ideas and theories clearly
Availability and Helpfulness:
·         instructor encourages students to see him/her if in difficulty
·         instructor is readily available to students outside class for consultation
·         instructor has rapport with students
·         special 'group help' sessions are provided for students who need it
·         instructor is conscientious in keeping appointments with students
·         instructor is willing to give personal assistance
Impartial Evaluation of Students; Quality of Examinations:
·         concepts emphasized in class are those emphasized in exams
·         exams cover material on which students expect to be tested
·         exams require student to do more than recall factual information
·         exams allow student to adequately demonstrate what was learned in the course
·         exams require synthesis of various parts of the course
·         the instructor tells students how they will be evaluated in the course
·         grades are based on a fair balance of course requirements and content
·         students are satisfied with the way they have been evaluated
·         students are quizzed frequently
·         instructor announces tests and quizzes in advance
·         instructor uses more than one type of evaluation device
These phrases could be useful in putting together a mid-term course evaluation while there's still time to make improvements. Collecting feedback at the end of the course is useful as feedback and for evaluation, but mid-term evaluations often are more useful in improving instruction.
Reference:
Feldman, K.A. (1988) "Effective College Teaching from the Students' and Faculties’' View: matched or mismatched priorities?" Research in Higher Education . 28 (4). 291-344.